UpDoer Technology
ENGAGEMENT MODELS

Engagement models built around how your team ships

QA support can be structured around your team's needs, release cadence and coverage requirements. These are the three ways we structure an engagement. Each suits a different shape of need; none is a tier of quality.

Calculate a directional price →

01

Dedicated Team

A QA capability aligned with your product and team, working alongside your release cycle on an ongoing basis.

A dedicated team works as an extension of your engineering organization, building familiarity with your product, codebase, and release rhythm over the course of the engagement.

ENGAGEMENT SHAPE
An ongoing, embedded QA capability aligned with your team.
COVERAGE APPROACH
Coverage grows and adapts alongside your product over time.
TYPICAL FIT
Teams with a continuous need for QA capability.

HOW IT WORKS

  1. Onboard

    The team learns your product, tracker, builds and release rhythm.

  2. Embed

    QA work runs alongside your sprints and releases, as an extension of your team.

  3. Adapt

    Coverage and automation change as your product changes.

  4. Report

    Findings and release risk are reported on your cadence, verified by a QA engineer.

02

Coverage-as-a-Service

QA coverage structured around your agreed testing needs, without maintaining a fully embedded team.

Coverage-as-a-Service focuses on maintaining agreed testing coverage across your product — manual, automated, or both — without the overhead of a fully embedded team.

ENGAGEMENT SHAPE
Structured coverage without a fully embedded team.
COVERAGE APPROACH
Coverage is scoped and agreed upfront, then maintained.
TYPICAL FIT
Teams with recurring, well-defined testing needs.

HOW IT WORKS

  1. Agree coverage

    Define what is tested: areas, types of testing and how often.

  2. Set up

    Build the manual and automated coverage to that agreed scope.

  3. Maintain

    Keep the agreed coverage running and current as the product evolves.

  4. Report

    Regular reports show what was covered, what was found and what remains open.

03

Scoped Quick-Start Sprint

A focused QA engagement around a clearly defined scope, suited to a specific release, feature, or audit.

A Quick-Start Sprint is a time-boxed engagement around a defined scope — useful for validating a release, auditing existing coverage, or getting started before committing to a longer engagement.

ENGAGEMENT SHAPE
A time-boxed engagement around a defined scope.
COVERAGE APPROACH
Coverage is focused on the agreed scope only.
TYPICAL FIT
A specific release, audit, or a first engagement.

HOW IT WORKS

  1. Define the scope

    Choose a release, a feature or an audit of existing coverage.

  2. Test

    Time-boxed testing against that scope only.

  3. Report

    A clear account of findings and the risk that remains.

  4. Decide what next

    Stop there, repeat the sprint, or move to ongoing coverage.

How to choose

Each model suits a different shape of QA need, not a tier of quality. Here is how they compare.

Comparison of engagement model characteristics
CharacteristicDedicated TeamCoverage-as-a-ServiceScoped Quick-Start Sprint
ENGAGEMENT SHAPEAn ongoing, embedded QA capability aligned with your team.Structured coverage without a fully embedded team.A time-boxed engagement around a defined scope.
COVERAGE APPROACHCoverage grows and adapts alongside your product over time.Coverage is scoped and agreed upfront, then maintained.Coverage is focused on the agreed scope only.
TYPICAL FITTeams with a continuous need for QA capability.Teams with recurring, well-defined testing needs.A specific release, audit, or a first engagement.
ESTIMATECalculate price →Calculate price →Calculate price →

One process, every model

See how each step works →

Whichever model fits, every engagement runs on the same seven-step quality engineering process. AI assists across it, and a QA engineer verifies the result.

Not sure which model fits?

Tell us about your product and release cadence, and we will suggest one. Or use the calculator for a directional estimate first; it is a comparison tool, not a quote.